Because they’re a twin-tube shock, we’ll leave them at lower pressure than the stock monotubes. The car will sit a little bit lower and you’ll pick up a little negative camber, even though the length for the Koni Sport shocks is the same as the stock ones.
To me this goes against the intent of Street class rules. It’s an open secret that certain aftermarket shocks lower the car, even though *supposedly* the spring perch locations are dimensionally correct. It is not insignificant either…about an inch, picking up at least a 1/2 degree of camber. The best racecar alignment shop in Atlanta can only get me -1.2 at all 4 corners meanwhile the same car, same year, same color, but on Konis is at -1.8 according to the owner. The difference is really obvious when were parked together in grid. But I guess that’s racing. Sincerely – a slow complainer 🙂
I’ve had that very discussion with someone a bit high up in the Solo community: ride height isn’t protestable yet spring perch height is.
maschinenbau said:
Because they’re a twin-tube shock, we’ll leave them at lower pressure than the stock monotubes. The car will sit a little bit lower and you’ll pick up a little negative camber, even though the length for the Koni Sport shocks is the same as the stock ones.
To me this goes against the intent of Street class rules. It’s an open secret that certain aftermarket shocks lower the car, even though *supposedly* the spring perch locations are dimensionally correct. It is not insignificant either…about an inch, picking up at least a 1/2 degree of camber. The best racecar alignment shop in Atlanta can only get me -1.2 at all 4 corners meanwhile the same car, same year, same color, but on Konis is at -1.8 according to the owner. The difference is really obvious when were parked together in grid. But I guess that’s racing. Sincerely – a slow complainer 🙂
It’s specifically written in the rules that shocks are allowed to affect ride height. Considering manufacturing tolerances, option packages, tire size differences, etc, good luck enforcing anything else anyway.
I get why in theory it’s allowed. To accommodate true “street” cars, they have to allow for aftermarket options so owners can maintain their cars for years to come without relying only on OEM parts supply (Rockauto, Advance, etc). This allowance accommodates all sorts of practical options, and their differences in tolerances and option packages, but also opens the door of opportunity for performance companies to sell pricey products that have a targeted advantage. So the only 2 options the rulemakers have are 1.) mandate OEM factory shocks only or 2.) allow all aftermarket shocks.
So I totally understand it. It just sucks that you have to drop $1k on shocks in addition to 200tw “street” tires to be competitive in the closest thing to a stock class. I guess that’s why it’s called “Street” not “Stock”.
The funny thing is a very similar conversation has been going on on another forum, except there’s another zero in the damper cost figure (okay, realistically it’s like $5k). I do sympathize, and I think it’s a little ridiculous that there’s zero functional restrictions other than being limited to two adjusters. But gas pressure and the resultant ride height effects are always going to have to be open unless you’re only allowing OE dampers. And even then, replacement OE dampers are very often not exactly identical to the actual original parts, so they could still end up not being fully compliant.
